Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

LEE v. WALMAN OPTICAL COMPANY, 8:14CV272. (2015)

Court: District Court, D. Nebraska Number: infdco20150828889 Visitors: 21
Filed: Aug. 27, 2015
Latest Update: Aug. 27, 2015
Summary: ORDER RICHARD G. KOPF , Senior District Judge . IT IS ORDERED: 1. Pursuant to the parties' joint stipulation (filing 55 ), and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a), all counterclaims alleged by Defendant, Walman Optical Company, against Plaintiff, Scott Lee, are dismissed with prejudice, each party to pay its own costs and fees. 2. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on Defendant's counterclaims (filing 44 ) is denied without prejudice.

ORDER

IT IS ORDERED:

1. Pursuant to the parties' joint stipulation (filing 55), and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a), all counterclaims alleged by Defendant, Walman Optical Company, against Plaintiff, Scott Lee, are dismissed with prejudice, each party to pay its own costs and fees.

2. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on Defendant's counterclaims (filing 44) is denied without prejudice.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer