RENCHER v. WILLIAMS, 4:11CV1059 RWS. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. Missouri
Number: infdco20120725e00
Visitors: 14
Filed: Jul. 24, 2012
Latest Update: Jul. 24, 2012
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RODNEY W. SIPPEL, District Judge. This matter is before me on plaintiff's "motion to deny the summary judgment/order for a continuance." Plaintiff's opposition to defendant's motion for summary judgment is due tomorrow. Yesterday, plaintiff filed a motion to deny summary judgment or extend her time to respond to summary judgment so that she may take discovery about the return of service filed in this case. Plaintiff continues to insist that defendant is in default despite
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RODNEY W. SIPPEL, District Judge. This matter is before me on plaintiff's "motion to deny the summary judgment/order for a continuance." Plaintiff's opposition to defendant's motion for summary judgment is due tomorrow. Yesterday, plaintiff filed a motion to deny summary judgment or extend her time to respond to summary judgment so that she may take discovery about the return of service filed in this case. Plaintiff continues to insist that defendant is in default despite ..
More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
RODNEY W. SIPPEL, District Judge.
This matter is before me on plaintiff's "motion to deny the summary judgment/order for a continuance." Plaintiff's opposition to defendant's motion for summary judgment is due tomorrow. Yesterday, plaintiff filed a motion to deny summary judgment or extend her time to respond to summary judgment so that she may take discovery about the return of service filed in this case. Plaintiff continues to insist that defendant is in default despite the fact that defendant has entered an appearance, answered plaintiff's complaint, engaged in discovery, filed numerous motions, and now moved for summary judgment. As I have explained in prior Orders, defendant is not in default. Moreover, discovery in this case has closed. Finally, plaintiff does not seek an extension of time so that she may properly respond to the issues raised by defendant in his motion for summary judgment. For all these reasons, plaintiff's motion will be denied. However, I will give plaintiff an additional ten (10) days to file her opposition to summary judgment.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's "motion to deny summary judgment/order a continuance" [#46] is denied. Plaintiff's opposition to defendant's motion for summary judgment shall be filed no later than August 6, 2012, and any reply brief in support of summary judgment shall be filed no later than August 16, 2012.
Source: Leagle
