Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

CORBETT v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., 13-928 (MJD/JSM). (2014)

Court: District Court, D. Minnesota Number: infdco20140212839 Visitors: 6
Filed: Feb. 11, 2014
Latest Update: Feb. 11, 2014
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL J. DAVIS, Chief District Judge. The above-entitled matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Janie S. Mayeron dated December 9, 2013. [Docket No. 19] Plaintiff filed objections 1 to the Report and Recommendation. [Docket No. 20] Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de novo review upon the record. 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.2(b). Based upon that review, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation o
More

ORDER

MICHAEL J. DAVIS, Chief District Judge.

The above-entitled matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Janie S. Mayeron dated December 9, 2013. [Docket No. 19] Plaintiff filed objections1 to the Report and Recommendation. [Docket No. 20]

Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de novo review upon the record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.2(b). Based upon that review, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Mayeron dated December 9, 2013.

Accordingly, based upon the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED2:

1. The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Janie S. Mayeron dated December 9, 2013 [Docket No. 19]. 2. Defendant Bank of America, N.A.'s Motion to Dismiss [Docket No. 4] is GRANTED. 3. This case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 4. The Clerk's Office is directed to send a copy of the Order to William B. Butler, 33 South Sixth Street, Suite 4100, Minneapolis, MN 55402.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

FootNotes


1. By Order dated January 14, 2014 (Civil No. 13-mc-49 (MJD) (Doc. No. 10)), this Court suspended attorney William B. Butler from the practice of law in the United States District Court, District of Minnesota, effective December 26, 2013. Because Defendant's objection was filed prior to his suspension, the Court has considered the objection in making its decision.
2. Attorney Butler is reminded of his obligation to notify his client of the Court's decision herein.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer