Bryant v. Baca, 3:18-cv-00117-LRH-VPC. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20180813a38
Visitors: 25
Filed: Aug. 10, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 10, 2018
Summary: ORDER LARRY R. HICKS , District Judge . Petitioner Leland J. Bryant has submitted a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. Bryant filed a response to this court's order to show cause and file proof to demonstrate that the petition was timely filed (ECF Nos. 5, 7). As a response by respondents may assist the court in resolving the timeliness issue, the petition shall be filed and served on respondents. Respondents shall file a response within thirty days of
Summary: ORDER LARRY R. HICKS , District Judge . Petitioner Leland J. Bryant has submitted a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. Bryant filed a response to this court's order to show cause and file proof to demonstrate that the petition was timely filed (ECF Nos. 5, 7). As a response by respondents may assist the court in resolving the timeliness issue, the petition shall be filed and served on respondents. Respondents shall file a response within thirty days of ..
More
ORDER
LARRY R. HICKS, District Judge.
Petitioner Leland J. Bryant has submitted a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Bryant filed a response to this court's order to show cause and file proof to demonstrate that the petition was timely filed (ECF Nos. 5, 7). As a response by respondents may assist the court in resolving the timeliness issue, the petition shall be filed and served on respondents. Respondents shall file a response within thirty days of the date of this order.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that that the Clerk shall file and ELECTRONICALLY SERVE the petition (ECF No. 1-1) on the respondents.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall add Adam Paul Laxalt, Nevada Attorney General, as counsel for respondents.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents shall file a response to the showcause order within thirty (30) days of service of the petition.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's motion for extension of time to respond to the show-cause order (ECF No. 6) is GRANTED nunc pro tunc.
Source: Leagle