Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation v. Rancho Lake Condominium Unit-Owners' Association, Inc., 2:17-cv-00023-APG-GWF. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20170201d44
Visitors: 9
Filed: Jan. 30, 2017
Latest Update: Jan. 30, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEFENDANT RANCHO LAKE CONDOMINIUM UNIT-OWNERS' ASSOCIATION, INC.'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (1 st Request) GEORGE FOLEY, Jr. , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their respective counsel that Defendant RANCHO LAKE CONDOMINIUM UNIT-OWNERS' ASSOCIATION, INC. ("hereinafter, HOA") shall have through and including February 13, 2017, within which to file and serve a response to Plaintiff FEDERAL HOME LOAN MOR
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEFENDANT RANCHO LAKE CONDOMINIUM UNIT-OWNERS' ASSOCIATION, INC.'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (1 st Request) GEORGE FOLEY, Jr. , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their respective counsel that Defendant RANCHO LAKE CONDOMINIUM UNIT-OWNERS' ASSOCIATION, INC. ("hereinafter, HOA") shall have through and including February 13, 2017, within which to file and serve a response to Plaintiff FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORT..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEFENDANT RANCHO LAKE CONDOMINIUM UNIT-OWNERS' ASSOCIATION, INC.'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (1st Request)
GEORGE FOLEY, Jr., Magistrate Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their respective counsel that Defendant RANCHO LAKE CONDOMINIUM UNIT-OWNERS' ASSOCIATION, INC. ("hereinafter, HOA") shall have through and including February 13, 2017, within which to file and serve a response to Plaintiff FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION's (hereinafter, "FHLM") Complaint [ECF No. 1].
This is the first extension from the original due date of January 13, 2017, and the parties' first request for an extension.
Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(b), the parties state the reason for the continuance is that counsel for HOA was just recently retained and requires more time to evaluate and to respond to FHLM's Complaint. The parties have entered into the agreement in good faith and not for purposes of delay. This is the parties' way of accommodating one another given the overall increase in litigation in this area of law.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
