LUCAS v. CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC., 4:12CV2179 RWS. (2013)
Court: District Court, E.D. Missouri
Number: infdco20130621a84
Visitors: 6
Filed: Jun. 20, 2013
Latest Update: Jun. 20, 2013
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RODNEY W. SIPPEL, District Judge. As discussed with the parties during today's status conference in the courtroom, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that there will be a scheduling conference in this case on August 20, 2013 at 10:00 a.m. in the chambers of the undersigned. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, by no later than 9:00 a.m. on August 19, 2013, the parties will file a proposed amended joint scheduling plan that complies with my Order Setting Rule 16 Conference dated Januar
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RODNEY W. SIPPEL, District Judge. As discussed with the parties during today's status conference in the courtroom, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that there will be a scheduling conference in this case on August 20, 2013 at 10:00 a.m. in the chambers of the undersigned. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, by no later than 9:00 a.m. on August 19, 2013, the parties will file a proposed amended joint scheduling plan that complies with my Order Setting Rule 16 Conference dated January..
More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
RODNEY W. SIPPEL, District Judge.
As discussed with the parties during today's status conference in the courtroom,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that there will be a scheduling conference in this case on August 20, 2013 at 10:00 a.m. in the chambers of the undersigned.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, by no later than 9:00 a.m. on August 19, 2013, the parties will file a proposed amended joint scheduling plan that complies with my Order Setting Rule 16 Conference dated January 29, 2013 and also addresses issues of class certification, including discovery, briefing, bifurcation if necessary, and any requested hearing.1
FootNotes
1. This is not just a "suggestion" as both parties apparently thought my prior Order of March 7, 2013 was, and the parties must provide actual dates in their proposed plan — "x days after the Court's ruling" is not an actual date. Both parties are responsible for submitting this document, and both parties will be sanctioned for failure to comply with this Order. The Court will enter a scheduling Order at the August 20, 2013 conference if this case has not been settled, so I suggest that both parties engage in good faith settlement efforts if, as they claim, they believe this case can be resolved without further proceedings.
Source: Leagle
