Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Johnson, 1:19-cr-00219. (2020)

Court: District Court, W.D. Michigan Number: infdco20200225987 Visitors: 7
Filed: Feb. 07, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 07, 2020
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION PHILLIP J. GREEN , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to W.D. MICH. L.CR.R. 11.1, I conducted a plea hearing in the captioned case on February 7, 2020, after receiving the written consent of defendant and all counsel. At the hearing, defendant Prince Elijah Johnson entered a plea of guilty to Count 1 of the Superseding Indictment in exchange for the undertakings made by the government in the written plea agreement. In Count 1 of the Superseding Indictment, defendant is c
More

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Pursuant to W.D. MICH. L.CR.R. 11.1, I conducted a plea hearing in the captioned case on February 7, 2020, after receiving the written consent of defendant and all counsel. At the hearing, defendant Prince Elijah Johnson entered a plea of guilty to Count 1 of the Superseding Indictment in exchange for the undertakings made by the government in the written plea agreement. In Count 1 of the Superseding Indictment, defendant is charged with conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute more than 50 grams of methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C.§§ 846 and 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A)(viii).

On the basis of the record made at the hearing, I find that defendant is fully capable and competent to enter an informed plea; that the plea is made knowingly and with full understanding of each of the rights waived by defendant; that it is made voluntarily and free from any force, threats, or promises, apart from the promises in the plea agreement; that the defendant understands the nature of the charge and penalties provided by law; and that the plea has a sufficient basis in fact.

Accordingly, I recommend that defendant's plea of guilty to Count 1 of the Superseding Indictment be accepted, that the court adjudicate defendant guilty, and that the written plea agreement be considered for acceptance at the time of sentencing. Acceptance of the plea, adjudication of guilt, acceptance of the plea agreement, and imposition of sentence are specifically reserved for the district judge.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer