Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. REED, 8:14CR285. (2014)

Court: District Court, D. Nebraska Number: infdco20140829n46 Visitors: 20
Filed: Aug. 27, 2014
Latest Update: Aug. 27, 2014
Summary: ORDER THOMAS D. THALKEN, Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the court on the oral motion of the government and the defendants Danny Reed and Tammy Knight for an extension of the discovery and pretrial motion deadlines. The motion was made during the arraignment on the Indictment on August 27, 2014. The defendants acknowledged the additional time needed for the motion would be excluded under the calculations under the Speedy Trial Act. The oral motion was granted. IT IS ORDERED: 1. The
More

ORDER

THOMAS D. THALKEN, Magistrate Judge.

This matter is before the court on the oral motion of the government and the defendants Danny Reed and Tammy Knight for an extension of the discovery and pretrial motion deadlines. The motion was made during the arraignment on the Indictment on August 27, 2014. The defendants acknowledged the additional time needed for the motion would be excluded under the calculations under the Speedy Trial Act. The oral motion was granted.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The motion for an extension of time to complete discovery and file pretrial motions is granted. The parties shall have to September 12, 2014, to complete discovery, and the parties shall have to on or before September 26, 2014, in which to file pretrial motions in accordance with the progression order.

2. The ends of justice have been served by granting such motion and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial. The additional time arising as a result of the granting of the motion, i.e., from August 27, 2014, and September 26, 2014, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act for the reason counsel requires additional time to adequately prepare the case, taking into consideration due diligence of counsel, and the novelty and complexity of this case. The failure to grant additional time might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B).

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer