TAYLOR v. BAUMAN, 2:16-CV-41. (2017)
Court: District Court, W.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20170221g50
Visitors: 5
Filed: Feb. 17, 2017
Latest Update: Feb. 17, 2017
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION GORDON J. QUIST , District Judge . The Court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Greeley's January 19, 2017, Report and Recommendation recommending that Defendants' motion for summary judgment based on Plaintiff's failure to exhaust his available grievance remedies be granted as to all claims and Defendants except Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment failure-to-protect claim against Defendant Brennan. The Report and Recommendation was duly served on the parties a
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION GORDON J. QUIST , District Judge . The Court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Greeley's January 19, 2017, Report and Recommendation recommending that Defendants' motion for summary judgment based on Plaintiff's failure to exhaust his available grievance remedies be granted as to all claims and Defendants except Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment failure-to-protect claim against Defendant Brennan. The Report and Recommendation was duly served on the parties as..
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
GORDON J. QUIST, District Judge.
The Court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Greeley's January 19, 2017, Report and Recommendation recommending that Defendants' motion for summary judgment based on Plaintiff's failure to exhaust his available grievance remedies be granted as to all claims and Defendants except Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment failure-to-protect claim against Defendant Brennan. The Report and Recommendation was duly served on the parties as of January 20, 2017. No objections have been filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Therefore the Court will adopt the Report and Recommendation.
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the January 19, 2017, Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 33) is approved and adopted as the Opinion of the Court.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment Based on Plaintiff's Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies (ECF No. 26) is GRANTED as to all claims and Defendants except Plaintiff's failure-to-protect claim against Defendant Brennan.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Bauman, Nayback, Rutter, Contreras, Immel, Harris, and Barrios are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
Source: Leagle