Martin v. Missouri Dept. of Corr., 2:18CV43 HEA. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Missouri
Number: infdco20190306e58
Visitors: 12
Filed: Mar. 05, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 05, 2019
Summary: OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER HENRY EDWARD AUTREY , District Judge . On March 1, 2019, summons for defendant Jack Wright was returned unexecuted for the second time in this action. The first time, the Missouri Attorney General's Office refused to waive service with respect to defendant Wright, noting that he no longer worked for the Missouri Department of Corrections. [Doc. #12]. The second time, the U.S. Marshal's Office was unable to attain service on defendant Wright at his last known a
Summary: OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER HENRY EDWARD AUTREY , District Judge . On March 1, 2019, summons for defendant Jack Wright was returned unexecuted for the second time in this action. The first time, the Missouri Attorney General's Office refused to waive service with respect to defendant Wright, noting that he no longer worked for the Missouri Department of Corrections. [Doc. #12]. The second time, the U.S. Marshal's Office was unable to attain service on defendant Wright at his last known ad..
More
OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HENRY EDWARD AUTREY, District Judge.
On March 1, 2019, summons for defendant Jack Wright was returned unexecuted for the second time in this action. The first time, the Missouri Attorney General's Office refused to waive service with respect to defendant Wright, noting that he no longer worked for the Missouri Department of Corrections. [Doc. #12]. The second time, the U.S. Marshal's Office was unable to attain service on defendant Wright at his last known address provided by the Missouri Attorney General's Office. [Doc. #19, #21 and #23]. Consequently, service cannot be effectuated on defendant Wright until plaintiff provides the Court with an updated address for this defendant.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, no later than twenty-one days from the date of this Memorandum and Order, plaintiff shall provide the Court with an address at which service can be effectuated on defendant Jack Wright. Plaintiff's failure to do so will result in a dismissal of this action against defendant Wright, without prejudice.
Source: Leagle
