U.S. v. Ruhl, 4:17CR3101. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20180213906
Visitors: 3
Filed: Feb. 12, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 12, 2018
Summary: ORDER CHERYL R. ZWART , Magistrate Judge . Defendant has moved to continue Defendant's change of plea hearing. (Filing No.27). As explained by counsel, the parties need additional time to engage in plea discussions The motion to continue is unopposed. Based on the representations of counsel, the court finds the motion should be granted. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1) Defendant's motion to continue, (Filing No. 27), is granted. 2) Defendant's plea hearing will be held before the undersign
Summary: ORDER CHERYL R. ZWART , Magistrate Judge . Defendant has moved to continue Defendant's change of plea hearing. (Filing No.27). As explained by counsel, the parties need additional time to engage in plea discussions The motion to continue is unopposed. Based on the representations of counsel, the court finds the motion should be granted. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1) Defendant's motion to continue, (Filing No. 27), is granted. 2) Defendant's plea hearing will be held before the undersigne..
More
ORDER
CHERYL R. ZWART, Magistrate Judge.
Defendant has moved to continue Defendant's change of plea hearing. (Filing No.27). As explained by counsel, the parties need additional time to engage in plea discussions The motion to continue is unopposed. Based on the representations of counsel, the court finds the motion should be granted. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
1) Defendant's motion to continue, (Filing No. 27), is granted.
2) Defendant's plea hearing will be held before the undersigned magistrate judge on May 15, 2018 at 2:30 p.m.. Defendant is ordered to appear at this hearing.
3) For the reasons stated by counsel, the Court finds that the ends of justice served by continuing Defendant's plea hearing outweigh the best interest of Defendant and the public in a speedy trial. Accordingly, the time between today's date and the district court judge's acceptance or rejection of the anticipated plea of guilty shall be excluded for speedy trial calculation purposes. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7). Failing to timely object to this order as provided under this court's local rules will be deemed a waiver of any right to later claim the time should not have been excluded under the Speedy Trial Act.
Source: Leagle
