BERRIAN v. JONES, 11-38 (JNE/JSM). (2012)
Court: District Court, D. Minnesota
Number: infdco20120315a74
Visitors: 2
Filed: Mar. 14, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 14, 2012
Summary: ORDER JOAN N. ERICKSEN, District Judge. Bernard Berrian first named Rachel Garner and Raymond Lankford as defendants in the Second Amended Complaint, which was filed on October 19, 2011. More than 120 days have passed since October 19, and it appears that neither Garner nor Lankford has been served. Accordingly, the Court orders Berrian to show cause within seven days of the date of this Order why the action against Garner and Lankford should not be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. C
Summary: ORDER JOAN N. ERICKSEN, District Judge. Bernard Berrian first named Rachel Garner and Raymond Lankford as defendants in the Second Amended Complaint, which was filed on October 19, 2011. More than 120 days have passed since October 19, and it appears that neither Garner nor Lankford has been served. Accordingly, the Court orders Berrian to show cause within seven days of the date of this Order why the action against Garner and Lankford should not be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Ci..
More
ORDER
JOAN N. ERICKSEN, District Judge.
Bernard Berrian first named Rachel Garner and Raymond Lankford as defendants in the Second Amended Complaint, which was filed on October 19, 2011. More than 120 days have passed since October 19, and it appears that neither Garner nor Lankford has been served. Accordingly, the Court orders Berrian to show cause within seven days of the date of this Order why the action against Garner and Lankford should not be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m); Carmona v. Ross, 376 F.3d 829, 830 (8th Cir. 2004) (per curiam).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
