GROSS v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, 11-3415 (MJD/SER). (2012)
Court: District Court, D. Minnesota
Number: infdco20120323i34
Visitors: 15
Filed: Mar. 23, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 23, 2012
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL J. DAVIS, Chief District Judge. The above-entitled matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau dated January 31, 2012. Plaintiff Jamal Gross filed objections to the Report and Recommendation. The Court has carefully reviewed Plaintiff's "Traverse Response to the Report and Recommendation" and considered that, even if that document is construed as an attempt to amend Plaintiff's Amended Complaint, the Second Amen
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL J. DAVIS, Chief District Judge. The above-entitled matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau dated January 31, 2012. Plaintiff Jamal Gross filed objections to the Report and Recommendation. The Court has carefully reviewed Plaintiff's "Traverse Response to the Report and Recommendation" and considered that, even if that document is construed as an attempt to amend Plaintiff's Amended Complaint, the Second Amend..
More
ORDER
MICHAEL J. DAVIS, Chief District Judge.
The above-entitled matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau dated January 31, 2012. Plaintiff Jamal Gross filed objections to the Report and Recommendation. The Court has carefully reviewed Plaintiff's "Traverse Response to the Report and Recommendation" and considered that, even if that document is construed as an attempt to amend Plaintiff's Amended Complaint, the Second Amended Complaint would fail to plead an actionable civil rights claim against any of the Defendants for the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation.
Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de novo review upon the record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.2(b). Based upon that review, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Rau dated January 31, 2012. Because the District Court for the Northern District of Texas only transferred the claims against Defendants Warden Rios, Dr. Amy Boncher, Michael Issacson, and Pam Agrimson to the District of Minnesota, and those claims are summarily dismissed, the entire action in this Court is dismissed and judgment shall be entered.
Accordingly, based upon the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1. The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau dated January 31, 2012 [Docket No. 20].
2. This action is summarily DISMISSED.
Source: Leagle
