Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Interior Electric Incorporated Nevada v. T.W.C. Construction, Inc., 2-18-cv-01118-JAD-VCF. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20181120e40 Visitors: 16
Filed: Nov. 18, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 18, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS DEFENDANT PROLOGIS, L.P. WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND TO VACATE HEARING SET FOR DECEMBER 11, 2018, ON PROLOGIS, L.P.'S MOTION TO DISMISS ECF Nos. 83, 88 JENNIFER A. DORSEY , District Judge . Plaintiff Interior Electric Incorporated Nevada ("Interior Electric"), through the law firm of Marquis Aurbach Coffing and the Law Offices of Philip A. Kantor, P.C., and Defendant Prologis, L.P. ("Prologis"), through the law firm of McDonald Carano LLP, hereby stipulate to di
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS DEFENDANT PROLOGIS, L.P. WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND TO VACATE HEARING SET FOR DECEMBER 11, 2018, ON PROLOGIS, L.P.'S MOTION TO DISMISS

ECF Nos. 83, 88

Plaintiff Interior Electric Incorporated Nevada ("Interior Electric"), through the law firm of Marquis Aurbach Coffing and the Law Offices of Philip A. Kantor, P.C., and Defendant Prologis, L.P. ("Prologis"), through the law firm of McDonald Carano LLP, hereby stipulate to dismiss all claims against Prologis without prejudice and to vacate the hearing set for December 11, 2018, on Prologis' motion to dismiss [ECF Nos. 83-84].

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

Based on the parties' stipulation [ECF No. 88], and with good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that ALL CLAIMS against Defendant Prologis, L.P. are DISMISSED without prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Prologis's Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 83] is DENIED as moot, and the December 11, 2018, hearing on that motion to dismiss is VACATED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer