U.S. v. BANUELOS, 2:07-CR-137 JCM (RJJ). (2012)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20120529839
Visitors: 6
Filed: May 25, 2012
Latest Update: May 25, 2012
Summary: ORDER JAMES C. MAHAN, District Judge. Presently before the court is pro se petitioner Ricardo Banuelos' motion to vacate sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255. (Doc. #102). Petitioner argues in the instant 2255 motion to vacate sentence that he was denied effective assistance of counsel at sentencing. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the United States file an opposition or otherwise respond to petitioner's 2255 motion by June 21, 2012. Petitioner s
Summary: ORDER JAMES C. MAHAN, District Judge. Presently before the court is pro se petitioner Ricardo Banuelos' motion to vacate sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255. (Doc. #102). Petitioner argues in the instant 2255 motion to vacate sentence that he was denied effective assistance of counsel at sentencing. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the United States file an opposition or otherwise respond to petitioner's 2255 motion by June 21, 2012. Petitioner sh..
More
ORDER
JAMES C. MAHAN, District Judge.
Presently before the court is pro se petitioner Ricardo Banuelos' motion to vacate sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. (Doc. #102). Petitioner argues in the instant § 2255 motion to vacate sentence that he was denied effective assistance of counsel at sentencing.
Good cause appearing,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the United States file an opposition or otherwise respond to petitioner's § 2255 motion by June 21, 2012. Petitioner shall file a reply by July 21, 2012.
Source: Leagle