United States v. Chenier, 8:19CR30. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20190903e73
Visitors: 14
Filed: Aug. 30, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 30, 2019
Summary: ORDER SUSAN M. BAZIS , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the defendant's unopposed Motion and Amended Motion to Continue Trial [34] and [35]. Counsel informs the court that he is unavailable for trial at the previously scheduled time. For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the Defendant's unopposed Motion and Amended Motion to Continue Trial [69] are granted as follows: 1. The jury trial, now set for September 10, 2019, is continued to October 8, 2019. 2. In acco
Summary: ORDER SUSAN M. BAZIS , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the defendant's unopposed Motion and Amended Motion to Continue Trial [34] and [35]. Counsel informs the court that he is unavailable for trial at the previously scheduled time. For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the Defendant's unopposed Motion and Amended Motion to Continue Trial [69] are granted as follows: 1. The jury trial, now set for September 10, 2019, is continued to October 8, 2019. 2. In accor..
More
ORDER
SUSAN M. BAZIS, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on the defendant's unopposed Motion and Amended Motion to Continue Trial [34] and [35]. Counsel informs the court that he is unavailable for trial at the previously scheduled time. For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the Defendant's unopposed Motion and Amended Motion to Continue Trial [69] are granted as follows:
1. The jury trial, now set for September 10, 2019, is continued to October 8, 2019.
2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the court finds that the ends of justice will be served by granting this continuance and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as a result of the granting of this motion, that is, the time between today's date and October 8, 2019 shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant a continuance would deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B)(iv).
Source: Leagle
