Matson v. Nebraska Kansas Colorado Railway LLC, 7:17CV3144. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20180314d75
Visitors: 8
Filed: Feb. 22, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2018
Summary: FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION MICHAEL D. NELSON , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff filed the Complaint on October 31, 2017. ( Filing No. 1 ). Based on the record before the Court, Plaintiff failed to serve the Defendants and the Defendants have not voluntarily appeared. On January 31, 2018, the undersigned magistrate judge issued a show cause order requiring Plaintiff to show cause why this case should not be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) or for want of prosecution.
Summary: FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION MICHAEL D. NELSON , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff filed the Complaint on October 31, 2017. ( Filing No. 1 ). Based on the record before the Court, Plaintiff failed to serve the Defendants and the Defendants have not voluntarily appeared. On January 31, 2018, the undersigned magistrate judge issued a show cause order requiring Plaintiff to show cause why this case should not be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) or for want of prosecution. ..
More
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION
MICHAEL D. NELSON, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff filed the Complaint on October 31, 2017. (Filing No. 1). Based on the record before the Court, Plaintiff failed to serve the Defendants and the Defendants have not voluntarily appeared. On January 31, 2018, the undersigned magistrate judge issued a show cause order requiring Plaintiff to show cause why this case should not be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) or for want of prosecution. (Filing No. 4). The show cause order warned Plaintiff that failure to timely comply with the order may result in dismissal of the action without further notice. The deadline for responding to the show cause order was February 21, 2018. Plaintiff did not respond. Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED to Chief Judge Laurie Smith Camp that the abovecaptioned case be dismissed for failure of service and want of prosecution.
Admonition
A party may object to a magistrate judge's findings and recommendation by filing an objection within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy of the findings and recommendation. NECivR 72.2. Failure to timely object may constitute a waiver of any objection.
Source: Leagle