Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. KIRKLAND, CR 15-16-M-DLC. (2015)

Court: District Court, D. Montana Number: infdco20151016d05 Visitors: 23
Filed: Sep. 29, 2015
Latest Update: Sep. 29, 2015
Summary: FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING PLEA JEREMIAH C. LYNCH , Magistrate Judge . The Defendant, by consent, has appeared before me under Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 and has entered a plea of guilty to one count of the possession with the intent to distribute methamphetamine in violation of21 U.S.C. 841(a)(l) (Count III), as set forth in the Superseding Indictment. Defendant further agrees to the forfeiture of $24,950 in United States currency as specified in the Plea Agreement. In exchange for
More

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING PLEA

The Defendant, by consent, has appeared before me under Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 and has entered a plea of guilty to one count of the possession with the intent to distribute methamphetamine in violation of21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(l) (Count III), as set forth in the Superseding Indictment. Defendant further agrees to the forfeiture of $24,950 in United States currency as specified in the Plea Agreement. In exchange for Defendant's plea, the United States has agreed to dismiss Counts I and II of the Superseding Indictment.

After examining the Defendant under oath, I have made the following determinations:

1. That the Defendant is fully competent and capable of entering an informed and voluntary plea to the criminal offense charged against him, and an informed and voluntary admission to the allegation of forfeiture;

2. That the Defendant is aware of the nature of the charge against him and the consequences of pleading guilty to the charge;

3. That the Defendant understands the allegation of forfeiture and the consequences of admitting to the allegation;

4. That the Defendant fully understands his constitutional rights, and the extent to which he is waiving those rights by pleading guilty to the criminal offense charged against him, and admitting to the allegation of forfeiture;

5. That both his plea of guilty to the criminal offense charged against him and his admission to the allegation of forfeiture are knowingly and voluntarily entered, and are both supported by independent factual grounds sufficient to prove each of the essential elements of the criminal offense charged and the legal basis for the forfeiture.

The Court further concludes that the Defendant had adequate time to review the Plea Agreement with counsel, that he fully understands each and every provision of the agreement and that all of the statements in the Plea Agreement are true. Therefore, I recommend that the Defendant be adjudged guilty Count III of the Superseding Indictment, and that sentence be imposed. I further recommend that Counts I and II of the Superseding Indictment be dismissed. I further recommend the agreed forfeiture be imposed against Defendant.

This report is forwarded with the recommendation that the Court defer a decision regarding acceptance until the Court has reviewed the Plea Agreement and the presentence report.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer