Filed: Apr. 14, 2015
Latest Update: Apr. 14, 2015
Summary: PLAINTIFF'S UNOPPOSED REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (First Request) GLORIA M. NAVARRO , Chief District Judge . COMES NOW, Plaintiff, by and through their attorney, Leslie Mark Stovall, Esq., requesting an extension of time to answer the Defendant's Motion for summary Judgment. STATEMENT OF FACTS Plaintiff's counsel has requested an extension of time to file his opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment becaus
Summary: PLAINTIFF'S UNOPPOSED REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (First Request) GLORIA M. NAVARRO , Chief District Judge . COMES NOW, Plaintiff, by and through their attorney, Leslie Mark Stovall, Esq., requesting an extension of time to answer the Defendant's Motion for summary Judgment. STATEMENT OF FACTS Plaintiff's counsel has requested an extension of time to file his opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment because..
More
PLAINTIFF'S UNOPPOSED REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO THE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (First Request)
GLORIA M. NAVARRO, Chief District Judge.
COMES NOW, Plaintiff, by and through their attorney, Leslie Mark Stovall, Esq., requesting an extension of time to answer the Defendant's Motion for summary Judgment.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
Plaintiff's counsel has requested an extension of time to file his opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment because on April 9, 2014 he has a deposition scheduled for all morning, and then has a doctor's appointment he must attend in the afternoon.
Plaintiff's counsel requested a one-week extension from Defendant's counsel, who granted that request. See Exhibit 1, email exchange between Plaintiff's and Defendant's counsel.
This is the first such request from Plaintiff's counsel.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED:
The UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE/MAGISTRATE JUDGE hereby grants Plaintiff's First Request for an extension to file an Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. The opposition shall be due April 16, 2015.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Exhibit 1
Tracy Anne Lucas
From: Christopher A. Elsee
Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 10:41 AM
To: Tracy Anne Lucas
Subject: Fw: RE: Burrage-Simon v. State Farm — EXTENSION REQUEST
CAE Sent from iPhone
Begin forwarded message:
From: Brent Quist <bquist@dennettwinspear.com> Date: April 9, 2015 at 9:27:32 AM PDT To: `Christopher A. Elsee' <chris@lesstovall.com> Cc: `Debora Ponce' <ponce@dennettwinspear.com> Subject: RE: Burrage-Simon v. State Farm — EXTENSION REQUEST
Chris,
The one week extension on the MSJ opposition is fine with me. Plaintiff's response will be due April 16, 2015.
I hope to forward the draft Pre Trial Order to you soon.
Brent
From: Christopher A. Elsee [mailto:chris@lesstovall.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2015 5:57 PM To: Brent Quist Subject: Burrage-Simon v. State Farm — EXTENSION REQUEST
Mr. Quist:
Can you grant me a one-week extension to answer the MSJ in this thing? The reason I ask is because I'm getting thrown into a depo tomorrow that might take the majority of the day, and then I have a doctor appointment late afternoon.
I don't even know that I'll need one week, but if you could grant that I'd greatly appreciate it. If you do, I'll file an unopposed motion to extend time. I'm hoping I'll get the thing filed anyway, but just in case. . .
Thanks,
Christopher A. Elsee, Esq.
chris@lesstovall.com\www.lesstovall.com
STOVALL & ASSOCIATES
2301 Palomino Lane
Las Vegas, NV 89107
ph. 702.258.3034 fx. 702.258.0093
