Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Pena, 2:15-mj-0304-PAL (2015)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20150804c99 Visitors: 7
Filed: Jul. 31, 2015
Latest Update: Jul. 31, 2015
Summary: Stipulation to Continue Preliminary Hearing (Third Request) PEGGY A. LEEN , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between DANIEL G. BOGDEN, United States Attorney, and CRISTINA D. SILVA, Assistant United States Attorney, counsel for the United States of America, and John George, Esq., counsel for defendant JUAN MIGUEL PENA, that the preliminary hearing date in the above-captioned matter, currently scheduled for July 31, 2015, at 4:00 pm, be vacated and continued
More

Stipulation to Continue Preliminary Hearing (Third Request)

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between DANIEL G. BOGDEN, United States Attorney, and CRISTINA D. SILVA, Assistant United States Attorney, counsel for the United States of America, and John George, Esq., counsel for defendant JUAN MIGUEL PENA, that the preliminary hearing date in the above-captioned matter, currently scheduled for July 31, 2015, at 4:00 pm, be vacated and continued for sixty (60) days, to a date and time to be set by this Honorable Court

This stipulation is entered into for the following reasons

1. The parties request a continuance of the preliminary hearing so they may continue to engage in pre-indictment plea negotiations, which may eliminate the need for a preliminary hearing or an indictment.

2. The parties agree to the continuance.

3. The defendant is not incarcerated and does not object to the continuance.

4. Additionally, denial of this request for continuance could result in a miscarriage of justice.

5. The additional time requested herein is not sought for purposes of delay, but to for a possible pre-indictment resolution of the case.

6. The additional time requested by this stipulation, is allowed, with the defendant's consent under the Federal Rules of Procedure 5.1(d).

FINDINGS OF FACT AND ORDER

FINDINGS OF FACT

Based on the pending Stipulation of counsel, and good cause appearing therefore, the Court finds that:

1. That the parties seek to continue the preliminary hearing in order to continue to engage in pre-indictment plea negotiations, which may eliminate the need for a preliminary hearing or an indictment.

2. That the parties agree to the continuance.

3. That the defendant is not incarcerated and does not object to the continuance.

4. Additionally, that denial of this request for continuance could result in a miscarriage of justice.

5. That the additional time requested herein is not sought for purposes of delay, but to allow for a possible pre-indictment resolution of the case.

6. That the additional time requested by this stipulation, is allowed, with the defendant's consent under the Federal Rules of Procedure 5.1(d).

7. This is the third request to continue the preliminary hearing date filed herein.

For all of the above-stated reasons, the ends of justice would best be served by a continuance of the preliminary hearing date.

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

The ends of justice served by granting said continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant, since the failure to grant said continuance would be likely to result in a miscarriage of justice, would deny the parties herein sufficient time and the opportunity within which to be able to effectively and thoroughly prepare for the preliminary hearing, and possibly resolve the case prior to the preliminary hearing, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.

The continuance sought herein is allowed, with the defendant's consent, pursuant to Federal Rules of Procedure 5.1(d).

ORDER

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the preliminary hearing currently scheduled for July 31, 2015, at the hour of 4:00 pm, be vacated and continued to October 5, 2015, at the hour of 4:00 p.m.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer