U.S. v. Tipton, 4:16CR3042. (2016)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20160511c28
Visitors: 9
Filed: May 10, 2016
Latest Update: May 10, 2016
Summary: ORDER CHERYL R. ZWART , Magistrate Judge . Defendant has moved to continue defendant's status/change of plea hearing. (Filing No. 29). As explained by counsel, the parties need additional time to engage in plea discussions. The motion to continue is unopposed. Based on the representations of counsel, the court finds the motion should be granted. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1) Defendant's motion to continue, (filing no. 29), is granted. This case, insofar as it concerns this defendant, is
Summary: ORDER CHERYL R. ZWART , Magistrate Judge . Defendant has moved to continue defendant's status/change of plea hearing. (Filing No. 29). As explained by counsel, the parties need additional time to engage in plea discussions. The motion to continue is unopposed. Based on the representations of counsel, the court finds the motion should be granted. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1) Defendant's motion to continue, (filing no. 29), is granted. This case, insofar as it concerns this defendant, is r..
More
ORDER
CHERYL R. ZWART, Magistrate Judge.
Defendant has moved to continue defendant's status/change of plea hearing. (Filing No. 29). As explained by counsel, the parties need additional time to engage in plea discussions. The motion to continue is unopposed. Based on the representations of counsel, the court finds the motion should be granted. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
1) Defendant's motion to continue, (filing no. 29), is granted. This case, insofar as it concerns this defendant, is removed from the trial docket based upon the request of the defendant.
2) The defendant's change of plea hearing will be held before the undersigned magistrate judge on May 17, 2016 at 2:00 p.m. The defendant is ordered to appear at this hearing.
3) For the reasons stated by counsel, the Court finds that the ends of justice served by continuing defendant's plea hearing outweigh the best interest of the defendant and the public in a speedy trial. Accordingly, the time between today's date and the district court judge's acceptance or rejection of the anticipated plea of guilty shall be excluded for speedy trial calculation purposes. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7).
Source: Leagle
