STOKES v. WHITE, 4:16CV3027. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20170613b01
Visitors: 11
Filed: Jun. 12, 2017
Latest Update: Jun. 12, 2017
Summary: ORDER RICHARD G. KOPF , Senior District Judge . Plaintiff has filed a Motion to Leave to Amend Summary Judgment (Filing No. 62) "in order to correct error." Plaintiff does not specify the nature of the error, but states that he needs 30 additional days to "amend" his motion for summary judgment because of limited access to the law library. 1 Plaintiff filed his Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Filing No. 57) on May 31, 2017; Defendant has been ordered (Filing No. 61) to respond to suc
Summary: ORDER RICHARD G. KOPF , Senior District Judge . Plaintiff has filed a Motion to Leave to Amend Summary Judgment (Filing No. 62) "in order to correct error." Plaintiff does not specify the nature of the error, but states that he needs 30 additional days to "amend" his motion for summary judgment because of limited access to the law library. 1 Plaintiff filed his Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Filing No. 57) on May 31, 2017; Defendant has been ordered (Filing No. 61) to respond to such..
More
ORDER
RICHARD G. KOPF, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiff has filed a Motion to Leave to Amend Summary Judgment (Filing No. 62) "in order to correct error." Plaintiff does not specify the nature of the error, but states that he needs 30 additional days to "amend" his motion for summary judgment because of limited access to the law library.1
Plaintiff filed his Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Filing No. 57) on May 31, 2017; Defendant has been ordered (Filing No. 61) to respond to such motion on or before June 21, 2017; and, pursuant to Nebraska Civil Rule 7.1(c), Plaintiff may file a reply within seven days thereafter. Any "errors" Plaintiff needs to correct may be included in his reply to Defendant's response to Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Leave to Amend Summary Judgment (Filing No. 62) is denied because any "errors" Plaintiff needs to correct may be included in his reply to Defendant's response to Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Filing No. 57).
FootNotes
1. Plaintiff has filed numerous motions for extensions of time throughout this lawsuit, which has simply prolonged disposition of his claims. (See Filing No. 8, Filing No. 17, Filing No. 20, Filing No. 29, Filing No. 30, Filing No. 37, Filing No. 52.)
Source: Leagle
