Graham v. Pair-A-Dice Properties II, LLC, 4:16CV3028. (2016)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20160526c56
Visitors: 9
Filed: May 25, 2016
Latest Update: May 25, 2016
Summary: ORDER F.A. GOSSETT , District Judge . This matter is before the court on Defendant's Motion to Compel ( Filing No. 10 ) and Defendant's Motion to Withdraw ( Filing No. 16 ). Defendant initially filed a motion to compel Plaintiff, pro se, to supplement interrogatories and requests for production of documents. Defendant filed a motion to withdraw its motion to compel, stating Plaintiff has made a good faith attempt to supplement her discovery responses subsequent to the motion to compel, maki
Summary: ORDER F.A. GOSSETT , District Judge . This matter is before the court on Defendant's Motion to Compel ( Filing No. 10 ) and Defendant's Motion to Withdraw ( Filing No. 16 ). Defendant initially filed a motion to compel Plaintiff, pro se, to supplement interrogatories and requests for production of documents. Defendant filed a motion to withdraw its motion to compel, stating Plaintiff has made a good faith attempt to supplement her discovery responses subsequent to the motion to compel, makin..
More
ORDER
F.A. GOSSETT, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on Defendant's Motion to Compel (Filing No. 10) and Defendant's Motion to Withdraw (Filing No. 16). Defendant initially filed a motion to compel Plaintiff, pro se, to supplement interrogatories and requests for production of documents. Defendant filed a motion to withdraw its motion to compel, stating Plaintiff has made a good faith attempt to supplement her discovery responses subsequent to the motion to compel, making the motion to compel moot. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
1. Defendant's Motion to Compel (Filing No. 10) is denied as moot.
2. Defendant's Motion to Withdraw (Filing No. 16) is denied as moot.
Source: Leagle
