McGowan v. Kroger Co. Michigan 709, 16-13216. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20180914f97
Visitors: 6
Filed: Sep. 12, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 12, 2018
Summary: ORDER R. STEVEN WHALEN , Magistrate Judge . Before the Court is Defendant's Motion to Strike Improper Pleadings Filed by Plaintiffs [Doc. #88]. Specifically, they ask that the following pleadings be stricken: (1) Plaintiffs' Response to Defendant's Affidavit for Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint for Failure to Cooperate in Discovery and Failure to Obey a Court Order [Doc. #72]. (2) Plaintiffs' Motion for Sanctions Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 11(b) [Doc. #82]. (3) Plainti
Summary: ORDER R. STEVEN WHALEN , Magistrate Judge . Before the Court is Defendant's Motion to Strike Improper Pleadings Filed by Plaintiffs [Doc. #88]. Specifically, they ask that the following pleadings be stricken: (1) Plaintiffs' Response to Defendant's Affidavit for Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint for Failure to Cooperate in Discovery and Failure to Obey a Court Order [Doc. #72]. (2) Plaintiffs' Motion for Sanctions Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 11(b) [Doc. #82]. (3) Plaintif..
More
ORDER
R. STEVEN WHALEN, Magistrate Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant's Motion to Strike Improper Pleadings Filed by Plaintiffs [Doc. #88]. Specifically, they ask that the following pleadings be stricken:
(1) Plaintiffs' Response to Defendant's Affidavit for Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint for Failure to Cooperate in Discovery and Failure to Obey a Court Order [Doc. #72].
(2) Plaintiffs' Motion for Sanctions Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 11(b) [Doc. #82].
(3) Plaintiffs' Motion to File Video Disk in Traditional Manner [Doc. #84].
(4) Plaintiffs' Brief in Response to Defendant's Reply Brief in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. #86].
I have entered orders denying the motion for sanctions [Doc. #82] and the motion to file the video disk [Doc. #84]. In addition, I have filed a Report and Recommendation [Doc. #101] that disposes of Defendant's motion to dismiss as a discovery sanction as well as Defendant's motion for summary judgment, and have considered all pleadings filed with respect to those motions.
For these reasons, the present motion to strike [Doc. #88] is DENIED AS MOOT.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
