Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. EDGE, 14-201 (1) (MJD/TNL). (2015)

Court: District Court, D. Minnesota Number: infdco20150127d82 Visitors: 10
Filed: Jan. 25, 2015
Latest Update: Jan. 25, 2015
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL J. DAVIS, District Judge. The above-entitled matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung dated November 3, 2014. Defendant Anthony Edge and Defendant Deborah Edge each filed objections to the Report and Recommendation. Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de novo review upon the record. 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.2(b). Based upon that review, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendatio
More

ORDER

MICHAEL J. DAVIS, District Judge.

The above-entitled matter comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung dated November 3, 2014. Defendant Anthony Edge and Defendant Deborah Edge each filed objections to the Report and Recommendation.

Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de novo review upon the record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.2(b). Based upon that review, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation [Doc. Nos. 101, 103] of United States Magistrate Judge Leung dated November 3, 2014.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendant Anthony Edge's Motion to Suppress Evidence Obtained as a Result of Search and Seizure [Docket No. 52] is DENIED;

2. Defendant Anthony Edge's Motion to Suppress Statements, Admissions and Answers [Docket No. 53] is DENIED;

3. Defendant Anthony Edge's Motion to Suppress Wire Interceptions, Electronic Surveillance and Wiretapping [Docket No. 54] is DENIED;

4. Defendant Anthony Edge's Motion to Dismiss Counts 6 and 8 [Docket No. 55] is DENIED;

5. Defendant Anthony Edge's Motion to Dismiss Indictment [Docket No. 57] is DENIED;

6. Defendant Anthony Edge's Motion to Dismiss Count 1 [Docket No. 95] is DENIED;

7. Defendant Deborah Susan Edge's Motion to Dismiss Count 1 of the Indictment [Docket No. 66] is DENIED;

8. Defendant Deborah Susan Edge's Motion to Suppress Evidence Obtained as a Result of Search and Seizure [Docket No. 68] is DENIED; and

9. Defendant Deborah Susan Edge's Motion to Suppress Statements, Admissions and Answers [Docket No. 69] is DENIED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer