U.S. v. Valentine, 1:99-CR-01-02. (2018)
Court: District Court, W.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20180314c69
Visitors: 13
Filed: Mar. 13, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 13, 2018
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ROBERT J. JONKER , Chief District Judge . This matter is before the Court on Defendant's Motion for Modification or Reduction of Sentence Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (ECF No. 1027). On January 26, 2018, the Probation Department filed a Sentence Modification Report. The report was mailed to Defendant on the same day. Per this Court's order (ECF No. 1035), Defendant had 21 days after service of the report to file a response. No response has been filed. Bas
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ROBERT J. JONKER , Chief District Judge . This matter is before the Court on Defendant's Motion for Modification or Reduction of Sentence Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (ECF No. 1027). On January 26, 2018, the Probation Department filed a Sentence Modification Report. The report was mailed to Defendant on the same day. Per this Court's order (ECF No. 1035), Defendant had 21 days after service of the report to file a response. No response has been filed. Base..
More
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ROBERT J. JONKER, Chief District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Defendant's Motion for Modification or Reduction of Sentence Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3582(c)(2) (ECF No. 1027). On January 26, 2018, the Probation Department filed a Sentence Modification Report. The report was mailed to Defendant on the same day. Per this Court's order (ECF No. 1035), Defendant had 21 days after service of the report to file a response. No response has been filed.
Based on a review of Defendant's motion, the Sentence Modification Report, and the many filings and orders in this case, the Court has determined that the motion should be denied because the Guideline Amendment 782 does not reduce this Defendant's Guideline range.
Source: Leagle
