DOE v. STATE, 8:09CV456. (2012)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20120724997
Visitors: 19
Filed: Jul. 23, 2012
Latest Update: Jul. 23, 2012
Summary: ORDER RICHARD G. KOPF, Senior District Judge. IT IS ORDERED that: (1) The Unopposed Motion for Permission to Restrict (filing no. 513 ) is granted. (2) As provided below, the Unopposed Motion to Redact (filing no. 514 ) is granted in part and otherwise, to wit: A. As of approximately 2:21 P.M. on July 23, 2012, the digital audio recording for the morning session of July 18, 2012 of the non jury trial has been restricted so that it may only be accessed by counsel of record and case partici
Summary: ORDER RICHARD G. KOPF, Senior District Judge. IT IS ORDERED that: (1) The Unopposed Motion for Permission to Restrict (filing no. 513 ) is granted. (2) As provided below, the Unopposed Motion to Redact (filing no. 514 ) is granted in part and otherwise, to wit: A. As of approximately 2:21 P.M. on July 23, 2012, the digital audio recording for the morning session of July 18, 2012 of the non jury trial has been restricted so that it may only be accessed by counsel of record and case particip..
More
ORDER
RICHARD G. KOPF, Senior District Judge.
IT IS ORDERED that:
(1) The Unopposed Motion for Permission to Restrict (filing no. 513) is granted.
(2) As provided below, the Unopposed Motion to Redact (filing no. 514) is granted in part and otherwise, to wit:
A. As of approximately 2:21 P.M. on July 23, 2012, the digital audio recording for the morning session of July 18, 2012 of the non jury trial has been restricted so that it may only be accessed by counsel of record and case participants.
B. The transcriber has been notified when preparing the transcript to file the bench conference separately as a restricted document.
C. The motion is otherwise denied.
(3) This order pertains to Case Nos. 4:10CV3005 and 4:09CV3266.
Source: Leagle