Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. Bank, National Association v. SFR Investment Pool 1, LLC, 2:17 cv-01319-JCM-GWF. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180920e10 Visitors: 3
Filed: Sep. 19, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 19, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE RESPONSES TO DEFENDANT SFR INVESTMENT POOL 1, LLC'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DEFENDANT SFR INVESTMENT POOL 1, LLC'S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' SUMMARY JUDGMENT (First Request) JAMES C. MAHAN , District Judge . Pursuant to LR IA 6-1, LR 7-1, and LR 26-4, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendants, U.S. Bank, National Association, as Trustee for GSAA 2006-1 and SunTrust Mortgage, Inc. ("Plaintiffs") through undersigned counsel, the law firm of Dickinson W
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE RESPONSES TO DEFENDANT SFR INVESTMENT POOL 1, LLC'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DEFENDANT SFR INVESTMENT POOL 1, LLC'S OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' SUMMARY JUDGMENT

(First Request)

Pursuant to LR IA 6-1, LR 7-1, and LR 26-4, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendants, U.S. Bank, National Association, as Trustee for GSAA 2006-1 and SunTrust Mortgage, Inc. ("Plaintiffs") through undersigned counsel, the law firm of Dickinson Wright, PLLC, Defendant SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC ("SFR") through undersigned counsel, the law firm of Kim Gilbert Ebron, and Defendant San Marino Property Owners Association ("San Marino"), the law firm Lipson Neilson Cole Seltzer & Garin PC hereby agree and stipulate to extend the deadline to file responses to SFR's Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 54] and the Plaintiff's Response to SFR's Opposition its Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 46] because the parties are actively engaged in settlement discussions. This is the first request to extend the foregoing deadlines.

1. On June 8, 2018, Plaintiffs filed their Motion for Summary Judgment. [ECF No. 46]. 2. On June 29, 2018, a Stipulation and Order to Extend Time to File Responses to Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment and San Marino Property Owners Association's Motion For Summary Judgment (First Request) [ECF No. 51] was entered by the Court extending the time for filing responses from June 29, 2018, to September 6, 2018, to allow the Parties to fully address the issues in this case. 3. On September 6, 2018, SFR filed their Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment. [ECF No. 55]. 4. On September 6, 2018, SFR filed their Motion for Summary Judgment. [ECF No. 54]. 5. Plaintiffs' Response to SFR's Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 55] is currently due on September 21, 2018. The Parties have agreed to extend the deadline for Plaintiff to file its Response to SFR's Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 46] to October 5, 2018. 6. The Response to SFR's Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 54] is currently due on September 27, 2018. The Parties have agreed to extend the deadline for Plaintiffs to respond to SFR's Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 54] to October 11, 2018.

This is the first request for an enlargement of time is not made for any deleterious purpose or to cause delay, but is made in good faith by the Parties and in the interests of efficiency and judicial economy. The parties are actively engaged in settlement discussions and request additional time to file the foregoing responses to facilitate those settlement discussions.

Based on the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that the deadline for Plaintiffs to file their response to SFR's Opposition to its Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 46] shall be extended to October 5, 2018 and the deadline for Plaintiffs' to file their response to SFR's Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 54] shall be extended to October 11, 2018.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer