Filed: Mar. 23, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 23, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO STAY ENTIRE CASE PENDING SETTLEMENT (First Request) RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II , District Judge . Pursuant to Local Rules LR IA 6-2 and LR 7-1, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. ("Chase"), Defendant/Counterclaimant/Cross-Claimant SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC ("SFR") and Defendant Tuscalante Homeowners' Association ("Tuscalante"), through their respective attorneys, stipulate as follows: 1. On January 16, 2018, Chase, SFR, and Tuscalante filed compe
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO STAY ENTIRE CASE PENDING SETTLEMENT (First Request) RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II , District Judge . Pursuant to Local Rules LR IA 6-2 and LR 7-1, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. ("Chase"), Defendant/Counterclaimant/Cross-Claimant SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC ("SFR") and Defendant Tuscalante Homeowners' Association ("Tuscalante"), through their respective attorneys, stipulate as follows: 1. On January 16, 2018, Chase, SFR, and Tuscalante filed compet..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO STAY ENTIRE CASE PENDING SETTLEMENT
(First Request)
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II, District Judge.
Pursuant to Local Rules LR IA 6-2 and LR 7-1, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. ("Chase"), Defendant/Counterclaimant/Cross-Claimant SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC ("SFR") and Defendant Tuscalante Homeowners' Association ("Tuscalante"), through their respective attorneys, stipulate as follows:
1. On January 16, 2018, Chase, SFR, and Tuscalante filed competing motions for summary judgment, each of which stands fully briefed and submitted to the Court. See ECF Nos. 67, 68, 70, 74,75, 76, 77, 78, 79 & 80.
2. The Parties have since come to an agreement and are in the process of finalizing settlement.
3. Given the resolution and to avoid wasting resources and incurring potentially unnecessary expenses, the Parties agree, and hereby request, a stay of the case to give each side sufficient time and resources to finalize settlement.
4. The Parties make this stipulation in good faith and not for purposes of delay.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Motion(s) for Summary Judgment, ECF Nos. [67], [68], and [70] are DENIED without prejudice to refiling after stay is lifted.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
