Ortega v. Credit One Bank, N.A., 2:18-cv-01552-JAD-CWH. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20181114g50
Visitors: 14
Filed: Nov. 13, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 13, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT (Second Request) CARL W. HOFFMAN , Magistrate Judge . STIPULATION Plaintiff Ralph D. Ortega and Defendant Credit One Bank, N.A. ("Credit One") hereby stipulate and agree to extend the time for Credit One to answer or otherwise plead in response to the Complaint on file in this action, up to and including December 10, 2018. This is the second and final request for an extension. This request is made after the retention of th
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT (Second Request) CARL W. HOFFMAN , Magistrate Judge . STIPULATION Plaintiff Ralph D. Ortega and Defendant Credit One Bank, N.A. ("Credit One") hereby stipulate and agree to extend the time for Credit One to answer or otherwise plead in response to the Complaint on file in this action, up to and including December 10, 2018. This is the second and final request for an extension. This request is made after the retention of the..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT (Second Request)
CARL W. HOFFMAN, Magistrate Judge.
STIPULATION
Plaintiff Ralph D. Ortega and Defendant Credit One Bank, N.A. ("Credit One") hereby stipulate and agree to extend the time for Credit One to answer or otherwise plead in response to the Complaint on file in this action, up to and including December 10, 2018.
This is the second and final request for an extension. This request is made after the retention of the undersigned counsel by Credit One. During the next 30 days, the parties anticipate discussing possible resolution and/or alternative dispute resolution of this matter.
Accordingly, this stipulation is made in good faith and not for the purposes of delay.
ORDER
IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
