BARSZCZEWSKA v. JPM CHASE, PLUS FOUR, INC., 2:16-cv-00583-APG-CWH. (2016)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20160502c75
Visitors: 13
Filed: Apr. 29, 2016
Latest Update: Apr. 29, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT SELECT PORTFOLIO TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (Second Request) CARL W. HOFFMAN , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Margaret Z. Barszczewska ("Plaintiff"), and Defendant Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. ("SPS"), by and through their respective undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. SPS shall have through and including Monday, May 16, 2016 to file a response to Plaintiff's Complaint on file in this matter. This requ
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT SELECT PORTFOLIO TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (Second Request) CARL W. HOFFMAN , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Margaret Z. Barszczewska ("Plaintiff"), and Defendant Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. ("SPS"), by and through their respective undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. SPS shall have through and including Monday, May 16, 2016 to file a response to Plaintiff's Complaint on file in this matter. This reque..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT SELECT PORTFOLIO TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT
(Second Request)
CARL W. HOFFMAN, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff Margaret Z. Barszczewska ("Plaintiff"), and Defendant Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. ("SPS"), by and through their respective undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:
1. SPS shall have through and including Monday, May 16, 2016 to file a response to Plaintiff's Complaint on file in this matter.
This request for an extension of time to respond to the Complaint is not intended to cause any delay or prejudice to any party, but is intended so the parties may continue to discuss the informal resolution of the claims asserted in this case as against SPS.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
