U.S. v. JOHNSON, 8:13CR375. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20150501l12
Visitors: 5
Filed: Apr. 29, 2015
Latest Update: Apr. 29, 2015
Summary: ORDER THOMAS D. THALKEN , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the defendant's, Tracy Johnson, motions for copies of his docket sheet and other case filings (Filing Nos. 46 and 47). The defendant explains he is considering filling a motion under 28 U.S.C. 2255 to challenge his stipulated sentence and fabricated enhancement. See Filing No. 46. As explained in the court's previous order entered on March 25, 2015, before free copies of the record are furnished to the defen
Summary: ORDER THOMAS D. THALKEN , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the defendant's, Tracy Johnson, motions for copies of his docket sheet and other case filings (Filing Nos. 46 and 47). The defendant explains he is considering filling a motion under 28 U.S.C. 2255 to challenge his stipulated sentence and fabricated enhancement. See Filing No. 46. As explained in the court's previous order entered on March 25, 2015, before free copies of the record are furnished to the defend..
More
ORDER
THOMAS D. THALKEN, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on the defendant's, Tracy Johnson, motions for copies of his docket sheet and other case filings (Filing Nos. 46 and 47). The defendant explains he is considering filling a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to challenge his stipulated sentence and fabricated enhancement. See Filing No. 46. As explained in the court's previous order entered on March 25, 2015, before free copies of the record are furnished to the defendant, there must be a motion for collateral review of his conviction. See Filing No. 45 — Order (citing Chapman v. United States, 55 F.3d 390, 390-91 (8th Cir. 1995) (stating any request for a free transcript prior to the filing of a § 2255 motion is premature)). Accordingly, the court finds the motions should be denied at this time without prejudice to reassertion after filing a § 2255 petition or other timely motion. Upon consideration,
IT IS ORDERED:
The defendant's motions (Filing Nos. 46 and 47) are denied.
Source: Leagle
