Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. v. SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC, 2:17-CV-00324-GMN-PAL. (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20170712e56 Visitors: 5
Filed: Jul. 10, 2017
Latest Update: Jul. 10, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANT WILLOWS HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION'S MOTION TO DISMISS GLORIA M. NAVARRO , Chief District Judge . Plaintiff JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. ("Chase") and Defendant The Willows Homeowners' Association (the "HOA") (collectively, the "Parties"), through their counsel of record, stipulate as follows: 1. On February 2, 2017, Chase filed its complaint in this action ("Complaint"), naming the HOA as a necessary party. 2. On June 6, 2017, the
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANT WILLOWS HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION'S MOTION TO DISMISS

Plaintiff JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. ("Chase") and Defendant The Willows Homeowners' Association (the "HOA") (collectively, the "Parties"), through their counsel of record, stipulate as follows:

1. On February 2, 2017, Chase filed its complaint in this action ("Complaint"), naming the HOA as a necessary party.

2. On June 6, 2017, the HOA filed a motion to dismiss Chase's Complaint.

3. Chase's opposition and reply briefing ("Reply Brief") in response to the HOA's motion to dismiss was due on June 20, 2017.

4. The Parties hereby stipulate that Chase will have through July 21, 2017 to file its Opposition Brief.

5. The HOA shall have through August 4, 2017 to file any Reply to Chase's Opposition.

6. This is the Parties' first request to extend time for this brief.

7. The Parties agreed to this extension to accommodate the schedules of counsel and to offset necessary delays in briefing related to this Motion.

8. The request is made in good faith and is not intended to prejudice or cause delay.

ORDER

Based on the above stipulation between Chase and Defendant HOA and good cause appearing therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that Chase will have until July 21, 2017 to file its opposition and response to the HOA's motion to dismiss.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer