Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Limon, 2:17-cr-00392-JCM-NJK. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180411b45 Visitors: 7
Filed: Apr. 09, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 09, 2018
Summary: ORDER (Docket No. 21) NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Presently before the Court is Defendant's sealed ex parte motion for issuance of two Rule 17 subpoenas. Docket No. 21. 1 Although Defendant asks the Court to issue subpoenas, he fails to attach them to his motion. See id. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Defendant's ex parte motion for subpoenas, Docket No. 21, is hereby DENIED without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. FootNotes 1. Although Defendant filed his motion ex
More

ORDER

(Docket No. 21)

Presently before the Court is Defendant's sealed ex parte motion for issuance of two Rule 17 subpoenas. Docket No. 21.1 Although Defendant asks the Court to issue subpoenas, he fails to attach them to his motion. See id.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Defendant's ex parte motion for subpoenas, Docket No. 21, is hereby DENIED without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Although Defendant filed his motion ex parte and under seal, the Court does not seal this order or issue it ex parte. Defendant submits that he has already received copies of the requested documents from the United States, but found them illegible. Defendant further submits that he asked the United States to inspect the original documents, but the United States did not have them in its possession, necessitating the instant motion. As a result, Defendant has submitted no information that is unknown to the United States or should otherwise remain under seal.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer