MARTIN v. STATE, 8:16CV246. (2016)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20161221f50
Visitors: 18
Filed: Dec. 20, 2016
Latest Update: Dec. 20, 2016
Summary: ORDER RICHARD G. KOPF , Senior District Judge . IT IS ORDERED that: (1) Although Martin's motions appear to be directed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit in the caption of the motions, to the extent that I have jurisdiction, the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (filing no. 22) is granted, and the motion for certificate of appealability (filing no. 25), the motion for leave to use original record (filing no. 26) and the motion for appointment of couns
Summary: ORDER RICHARD G. KOPF , Senior District Judge . IT IS ORDERED that: (1) Although Martin's motions appear to be directed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit in the caption of the motions, to the extent that I have jurisdiction, the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (filing no. 22) is granted, and the motion for certificate of appealability (filing no. 25), the motion for leave to use original record (filing no. 26) and the motion for appointment of counse..
More
ORDER
RICHARD G. KOPF, Senior District Judge.
IT IS ORDERED that:
(1) Although Martin's motions appear to be directed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit in the caption of the motions, to the extent that I have jurisdiction, the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (filing no. 22) is granted, and the motion for certificate of appealability (filing no. 25), the motion for leave to use original record (filing no. 26) and the motion for appointment of counsel (filing no. 27) are denied.
(2) The Clerk shall send a copy of this order and the referenced motions to the Clerk of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.
Source: Leagle
