Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Clark v. Mirage Casino-Hotel, Inc., 2:18-cv-00392-APG-PAL. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20181207e82 Visitors: 5
Filed: Dec. 06, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 06, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEFENDANT'S DEADLINE TO FILE A REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (FIRST REQUEST) ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . Pursuant to Local Rules IA 6-1, IA 6-2, and 7-1, all parties hereby stipulate to extend the time for Defendant to file its Reply in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 21). This is the parties' first request to extend this deadline. This request is sought in good faith and not for purposes of undue delay
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEFENDANT'S DEADLINE TO FILE A REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

(FIRST REQUEST)

Pursuant to Local Rules IA 6-1, IA 6-2, and 7-1, all parties hereby stipulate to extend the time for Defendant to file its Reply in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 21). This is the parties' first request to extend this deadline. This request is sought in good faith and not for purposes of undue delay.

This extension is necessary because Defense Counsel who has primarily handled this matter, has had an unexpected emergency that requires her attention out of the office.

Therefore, Plaintiff's counsel has agreed and the Parties hereby stipulation that Defendant shall have up to and including December 27, 2018, to file its reply in support of its motion for summary judgment.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer