Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

USROF III LEGAL TITLE TRUST 2015-1 v. TBD, LLC, 2:17-cv-02083-RFB-PAL. (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20171103c72 Visitors: 10
Filed: Oct. 31, 2017
Latest Update: Oct. 31, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR GAYLE A. KERN, LTD. DBA KERN & ASSOCIATES, LTD. TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT [Fourth Request] PEGGY A. LEEN , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between Plaintiff, USROF III Legal Title Trust 2015-1, by U.S. Bank National Association, as Legal Title Trustee ("Plaintiff"), by and through its counsel, Wright, Finlay & Zak, LLP, and Defendant, Gayle A. Kern, Ltd. dba Kern & Associates, Ltd. ("Kern"), by and through its coun
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR GAYLE A. KERN, LTD. DBA KERN & ASSOCIATES, LTD. TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

[Fourth Request]

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between Plaintiff, USROF III Legal Title Trust 2015-1, by U.S. Bank National Association, as Legal Title Trustee ("Plaintiff"), by and through its counsel, Wright, Finlay & Zak, LLP, and Defendant, Gayle A. Kern, Ltd. dba Kern & Associates, Ltd. ("Kern"), by and through its counsel Kern & Associates, Ltd., to extend the deadline for Kern to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint up-to-and-including November 17, 2017.

Pursuant to a prior Stipulation and Order, the current deadline for Kern to file its answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is October 27, 2017.

Plaintiff and Kern (collectively referred to as the "Parties") stipulate and agree to an additional, extension of the deadline for Kern's answer or other response to the Complaint up-toand-including November 17, 2017. The Parties continue progress in substantive discussions with regard to the claims and defenses in this matter, and wish to conserve the time and resources of the Parties and the Court while such discussions move forward. Therefore, good cause exists for the extension. This is the fourth request for an extension of time with respect to this matter and is not intended to cause delay or prejudice to any party.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED that the Stipulation is DENIED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer