U.S. v. TIERNEY, 4:15CR3020. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20151028d51
Visitors: 15
Filed: Oct. 27, 2015
Latest Update: Oct. 27, 2015
Summary: ORDER CHERYL R. ZWART , District Judge . Defendant has moved to continue defendant's change of plea hearing. (Filing No. 29). As explained by counsel, the parties need additional time to engage in plea discussions. The motion to continue is unopposed. Based on the representations of counsel, the court finds the motion should be granted. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1) Defendant's motion to continue, (filing no. 29), is granted. 2) The defendant's plea hearing will be held before the under
Summary: ORDER CHERYL R. ZWART , District Judge . Defendant has moved to continue defendant's change of plea hearing. (Filing No. 29). As explained by counsel, the parties need additional time to engage in plea discussions. The motion to continue is unopposed. Based on the representations of counsel, the court finds the motion should be granted. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1) Defendant's motion to continue, (filing no. 29), is granted. 2) The defendant's plea hearing will be held before the unders..
More
ORDER
CHERYL R. ZWART, District Judge.
Defendant has moved to continue defendant's change of plea hearing. (Filing No. 29). As explained by counsel, the parties need additional time to engage in plea discussions. The motion to continue is unopposed. Based on the representations of counsel, the court finds the motion should be granted. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
1) Defendant's motion to continue, (filing no. 29), is granted.
2) The defendant's plea hearing will be held before the undersigned magistrate judge on November 12, 2015 at 10:30 a.m. The defendant is ordered to appear at this hearing.
3) No further plea continuances will be granted. If the defendant is not prepared to plead guilty on November 12, 2015, the time calendared for the change of plea hearing will be used to set the trial date.
4) For the reasons stated by counsel, the Court finds that the ends of justice served by continuing defendant's plea hearing outweigh the best interest of the defendant and the public in a speedy trial. Accordingly, the time between today's date and the district court judge's acceptance or rejection of the anticipated plea of guilty shall be excluded for speedy trial calculation purposes. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7).
Source: Leagle
