U.S. v. Chavez, 8:18CR146. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20190620c00
Visitors: 16
Filed: Jun. 19, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 19, 2019
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL D. NELSON , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the defendant Gabriel J. Chavez's unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [86]. Due to defendant's location, counsel needs additional time to allow defendant and defendant's counsel to share further and necessary discussion regarding trial and/or negotiated settlement. For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Continue Trial [86] is granted, as follows: 1. The jury trial, now set for June 24, 2019 is
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL D. NELSON , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the defendant Gabriel J. Chavez's unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [86]. Due to defendant's location, counsel needs additional time to allow defendant and defendant's counsel to share further and necessary discussion regarding trial and/or negotiated settlement. For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Continue Trial [86] is granted, as follows: 1. The jury trial, now set for June 24, 2019 is c..
More
ORDER
MICHAEL D. NELSON, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on the defendant Gabriel J. Chavez's unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [86]. Due to defendant's location, counsel needs additional time to allow defendant and defendant's counsel to share further and necessary discussion regarding trial and/or negotiated settlement. For good cause shown,
IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Continue Trial [86] is granted, as follows:
1. The jury trial, now set for June 24, 2019 is continued to July 29, 2019.
2. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the court finds that the ends of justice will be served by granting this continuance and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as a result of the granting of this motion, that is, the time between today's date and July 29, 2019, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant a continuance would deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B)(iv).
Source: Leagle
