USA v. Sheridan, CR 10-09-BLG-SPW. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Montana
Number: infdco20171115c55
Visitors: 18
Filed: Nov. 14, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 14, 2017
Summary: ORDER SUSAN P. WATTERS , District Judge . On October 24, 2017, United States Magistrate Judge Jeremiah Lynch entered Findings and Recommendations with respect to the October 12, 2016, petition for revocation of Defendant Sheridan's supervised release. (Docs. 37 and 50). Based on the government's evidence in support of and Sheridan's admissions to the alleged violations, Judge Lynch recommends Sheridan's supervised release be revoked and recommends that this Court sentence Sheridan to one da
Summary: ORDER SUSAN P. WATTERS , District Judge . On October 24, 2017, United States Magistrate Judge Jeremiah Lynch entered Findings and Recommendations with respect to the October 12, 2016, petition for revocation of Defendant Sheridan's supervised release. (Docs. 37 and 50). Based on the government's evidence in support of and Sheridan's admissions to the alleged violations, Judge Lynch recommends Sheridan's supervised release be revoked and recommends that this Court sentence Sheridan to one day..
More
ORDER
SUSAN P. WATTERS, District Judge.
On October 24, 2017, United States Magistrate Judge Jeremiah Lynch entered Findings and Recommendations with respect to the October 12, 2016, petition for revocation of Defendant Sheridan's supervised release. (Docs. 37 and 50). Based on the government's evidence in support of and Sheridan's admissions to the alleged violations, Judge Lynch recommends Sheridan's supervised release be revoked and recommends that this Court sentence Sheridan to one day with credit for time served with no supervised release to follow. (Doc. 50 at 2).
A district judge "may accept, reject, or modify the recommended disposition" on a dispositive matter prepared by a magistrate judge proceeding without the consent of the parties for all purposes. Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b); see 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). "The court shall make a de nova determination of those portions of the [report and recommendation] to which objection is made." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Neither party objects to Judge Lynch's Findings and Recommendations. After review, the Court finds that Judge Lynch's Findings and Recommendations are without clear error.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Judge Lynch's Findings and Recommendations (Doc. 50) are ADOPTED IN FULL;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Sheridan's supervised release is revoked. Judgment will be entered by separate document.
Source: Leagle
