U.S. v. WILSON, 4:15CR3002. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20151211a05
Visitors: 34
Filed: Dec. 09, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 09, 2015
Summary: ORDER CHERYL R. ZWART , Magistrate Judge . The government has moved to continue the trial currently set for February 8, 2016. (Filing No. 55). As explained in the motion, the government's case agent is unavailable to assist with trial preparation during the week prior to the current trial setting. The motion to continue is unopposed. Based on the showing set forth in the motion, the court finds the motion should be granted. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1) The government's motion to continu
Summary: ORDER CHERYL R. ZWART , Magistrate Judge . The government has moved to continue the trial currently set for February 8, 2016. (Filing No. 55). As explained in the motion, the government's case agent is unavailable to assist with trial preparation during the week prior to the current trial setting. The motion to continue is unopposed. Based on the showing set forth in the motion, the court finds the motion should be granted. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1) The government's motion to continue..
More
ORDER
CHERYL R. ZWART, Magistrate Judge.
The government has moved to continue the trial currently set for February 8, 2016. (Filing No. 55). As explained in the motion, the government's case agent is unavailable to assist with trial preparation during the week prior to the current trial setting. The motion to continue is unopposed. Based on the showing set forth in the motion, the court finds the motion should be granted. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED:
1) The government's motion to continue, (filing no. 55), is granted.
2) The trial of this case is set to commence before the Honorable John M. Gerrard, United States District Judge, in North Platte, Nebraska, at 9:00 a.m. on February 16, 2016, or as soon thereafter as the case may be called, for a duration of five (5) trial days. Jury selection will be held at commencement of trial.
3) Based upon the showing set forth in the government's motion and the representations of counsel, the Court further finds that the ends of justice will be served by continuing the trial; and that the purposes served by continuing the trial date in this case outweigh the interest of the defendant and the public in a speedy trial. Accordingly, the additional time arising as a result of the granting of the motion, the time between February 8, 2016 and February 16, 2016, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirements of the Speedy Trial Act, because despite counsel's due diligence, additional time is needed to adequately prepare this case for trial and failing to grant additional time might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(1) & (h)(7).
Source: Leagle
