BRITAIN v. CLARK COUNTY, 2:12-CV-01240-JAD-RJJ. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20150720556
Visitors: 18
Filed: Jun. 26, 2015
Latest Update: Jun. 26, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION TO POSPTONE THE FILING OF THE JOINT PRE-TRIAL ORDER JENNIFER A. DORSEY , District Judge . COMES NOW, Plaintiffs and Defendant, by and through their counsels of record, and pursuant to Local Rule 6-1, the parties hereby stipulate, agree, and make joint application to postpone the date to file the Joint Pre-Trial Order. The parties propose this postponement to allow all necessary procedural activities to resolve prior to the filing of a Joint Pre-Trial Order. Plaintiffs' Renewed
Summary: STIPULATION TO POSPTONE THE FILING OF THE JOINT PRE-TRIAL ORDER JENNIFER A. DORSEY , District Judge . COMES NOW, Plaintiffs and Defendant, by and through their counsels of record, and pursuant to Local Rule 6-1, the parties hereby stipulate, agree, and make joint application to postpone the date to file the Joint Pre-Trial Order. The parties propose this postponement to allow all necessary procedural activities to resolve prior to the filing of a Joint Pre-Trial Order. Plaintiffs' Renewed M..
More
STIPULATION TO POSPTONE THE FILING OF THE JOINT PRE-TRIAL ORDER
JENNIFER A. DORSEY, District Judge.
COMES NOW, Plaintiffs and Defendant, by and through their counsels of record, and pursuant to Local Rule 6-1, the parties hereby stipulate, agree, and make joint application to postpone the date to file the Joint Pre-Trial Order.
The parties propose this postponement to allow all necessary procedural activities to resolve prior to the filing of a Joint Pre-Trial Order. Plaintiffs' Renewed Motion for Approval of a Collective Action Under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. and Motion for an Order Requiring Defendant to Provide Contact Information for the Potential Members of the Collective Action and to Assist in Providing the Requisite Notice for Such an Action, Dkt. No. 111 (hereinafter "Plaintiffs' Renewed Motion") is pending before the Court, and has the potential to alter the procedural prerequisites to trial. This stipulation is made in good faith and not for purposes of delay. This is the second request for continuance of the time to file the Joint Pre-Trial Order.
Based upon the foregoing, the parties request that this Court postpone the filing of the Joint Pre-Trial Order, currently set for July 29, 2015, in this matter until sixty (60) days following the Court's decision on Plaintiff's Renewed Motion.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
