Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Williams, 2:17-cr-00289-JAD-NJK. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180214973 Visitors: 10
Filed: Jan. 25, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 25, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SENTENCING (First Request) JENNIFER A. DORSEY , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Dayle Elieson, United States Attorney; Alexandra Michael, Assistant United States Attorney, counsel for the United States of America, Craig Mueller, Esq., counsel for defendant CARL WILLIAMS that the sentencing hearing currently scheduled for February 12, 2018, at the hour of 9:00 am, be vacated and continued to a future date no sooner than seventy-fiv
More

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SENTENCING

(First Request)

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Dayle Elieson, United States Attorney; Alexandra Michael, Assistant United States Attorney, counsel for the United States of America, Craig Mueller, Esq., counsel for defendant CARL WILLIAMS that the sentencing hearing currently scheduled for February 12, 2018, at the hour of 9:00 am, be vacated and continued to a future date no sooner than seventy-five (75) days and on a date and at a time convenient to the Court.

This Stipulation is entered into for the following reasons:

1. The undersigned AUSA will be unavailable on February 12, 2018 for the currently schedule sentencing hearing. 2. Defense counsel needs additional time to research and prepare a sentencing memorandum for the sentencing hearing. 3. The parties agree to the additional time. 4. The defendant is in custody and does not object to the continuance. 5. This is the first request for a continuance of the sentencing date.

FINDINGS OF FACT

Based on the pending Stipulation of counsel, and good cause appearing therefore, the Court finds that:

1. The undersigned AUSA will be unavailable on February 12, 2018 for the currently schedule sentencing hearing. 2. Defense counsel needs additional time to research and prepare a sentencing memorandum for the sentencing hearing. 3. The parties agree to the additional time. 4. The defendant is in custody and does not object to the continuance. 5. This is the first request for a continuance of the sentencing date. 6. Additionally, denial of this request for continuance could result in a miscarriage of justice.

For all of the above-stated reasons, the end of justice would best be served if Defendant's sentencing was rescheduled.

ORDER

IT IS ORDERED that the sentencing hearing currently scheduled for February 12, 2018, at 9:00am be vacated and continued to April 30, 2018 at the hour of 9:00 a.m.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer