U.S. v. CASAUS, 8:16CR364. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20170124c48
Visitors: 12
Filed: Jan. 23, 2017
Latest Update: Jan. 23, 2017
Summary: ORDER F.A. GOSSETT, III , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on defendant's unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [15]. Counsel needs addition time to investigate the matter and confer with his client. Defendant shall comply with NECrimR 12.1(a). For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Continue Trial [26] is granted as follows: 1. The jury trial now set for February 27, 2017 is continued to April 10, 2017. 2. The defendant shall file the affidavit required
Summary: ORDER F.A. GOSSETT, III , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on defendant's unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [15]. Counsel needs addition time to investigate the matter and confer with his client. Defendant shall comply with NECrimR 12.1(a). For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Continue Trial [26] is granted as follows: 1. The jury trial now set for February 27, 2017 is continued to April 10, 2017. 2. The defendant shall file the affidavit required b..
More
ORDER
F.A. GOSSETT, III, Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on defendant's unopposed Motion to Continue Trial [15]. Counsel needs addition time to investigate the matter and confer with his client. Defendant shall comply with NECrimR 12.1(a). For good cause shown,
IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Continue Trial [26] is granted as follows:
1. The jury trial now set for February 27, 2017 is continued to April 10, 2017.
2. The defendant shall file the affidavit required by paragraph 9 of the progression order and NE.CrimR 12.1(a) forthwith.
3. In accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), the court finds that the ends of justice will be served by granting this continuance and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Any additional time arising as a result of the granting of this motion, that is, the time between today's date and April 10, 2017, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant a continuance would deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) & (B)(iv).
Source: Leagle
