Filed: Feb. 09, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 09, 2012
Summary: ORDER LARRY R. HICKS, District Judge. Before this Court is Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb (#74 1 ) entered on January 4, 2012, recommending that Plaintiff's Motion for Injunctive Relief (#30), filed on April 13, 2011, and Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (#41), filed on June 23, 2011, be denied, and that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (#54), filed July 19, 2011, be granted. Plaintiff filed his "Motion to Resign" (which the court has construed
Summary: ORDER LARRY R. HICKS, District Judge. Before this Court is Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb (#74 1 ) entered on January 4, 2012, recommending that Plaintiff's Motion for Injunctive Relief (#30), filed on April 13, 2011, and Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (#41), filed on June 23, 2011, be denied, and that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (#54), filed July 19, 2011, be granted. Plaintiff filed his "Motion to Resign" (which the court has construed ..
More
ORDER
LARRY R. HICKS, District Judge.
Before this Court is Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb (#741) entered on January 4, 2012, recommending that Plaintiff's Motion for Injunctive Relief (#30), filed on April 13, 2011, and Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (#41), filed on June 23, 2011, be denied, and that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (#54), filed July 19, 2011, be granted. Plaintiff filed his "Motion to Resign" (which the court has construed as his Objection to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation) (#75) on January 17, 2012. Defendants have not filed a response. This action was referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and LR IB 1-4 of the Local Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada.
The Court has conducted its de novo review in this case, has fully considered the objections of the Plaintiff, the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b) (1) and Local Rule IB 3-2. The Court determines that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (#74) entered on January 4, 2012, should be adopted and accepted.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (#74) entered on January 4, 2012, is adopted and accepted, and Plaintiff's Motion for Injunctive Relief (#30) is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (#41) is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (#54) is GRANTED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Refers to court's docket number.