Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. Diaz-Orellana, 2:18-mj-361-VCF. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20181011e14 Visitors: 24
Filed: Oct. 10, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 10, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE PRELIMINARY HEARING CAM FERENBACH , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Dayle Elieson, United States Attorney, and Phillip N. Smith, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, counsel for the United States of America; Ryan Norwood, Assistant Federal Public Defender, counsel for Defendant JOSUE DIAZ-ORELLANA; and Michael J. Miceli, Esq., counsel for Defendant MIGUEL TORRES-ESCOBAR, that the preliminary hearing for the above-captioned mat
More

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE PRELIMINARY HEARING

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Dayle Elieson, United States Attorney, and Phillip N. Smith, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, counsel for the United States of America; Ryan Norwood, Assistant Federal Public Defender, counsel for Defendant JOSUE DIAZ-ORELLANA; and Michael J. Miceli, Esq., counsel for Defendant MIGUEL TORRES-ESCOBAR, that the preliminary hearing for the above-captioned matter, currently scheduled for October 11, 2018, at the hour of 4:00 p.m., be vacated and continued to a date and time convenient for this Court, but in no event earlier than one hundred and twenty (120) days.

This stipulation is entered for the following reasons:

1. The Government has made an early production of discovery to the Defendants in an effort to reach pre-indictment plea agreements, and counsel for the Defendants will need more time to review the discovery and discuss it with the Defendants.

2. The parties are researching the viability of entering into plea agreements considering the existence of a much larger investigation. Said plea agreements would obviate the need for either a preliminary hearing in this matter or for the Government to present this matter to a federal grand jury. Counsel for the Defendants will need additional time to discuss the Defendants' options with them.

3. Denial of this request for continuance of the preliminary hearing would potentially prejudice both the Defendants and the Government and unnecessarily consume this Court's valuable resources.

4. Additionally, denial of this request for continuance could result in a miscarriage of justice.

5. The additional time requested by this stipulation is excludable in computing the time within which the Defendants must be indicted and the trial herein must commence pursuant to the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(b) and 3161(h)(7)(A), considering the factors under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(i) and (iv).

6. This is the fourth request for a continuance of the preliminary hearing herein.

ORDER CONTINUING PRELIMINARY HEARING

Based on the pending Stipulation of counsel, and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that the preliminary hearing in the above-captioned matter as to Defendants JOSUE DIAZ-ORELLANA and MIGUEL TORRES-ESCOBAR, currently scheduled for October 11, 2018, at the hour of 4:00 p.m., be vacated and continued to February 7, 2019, at the hour of 4:00 PM.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer