Smith v. Clay, 2:15-cv-2361. (2018)
Court: District Court, W.D. Louisiana
Number: infdco20181205b04
Visitors: 18
Filed: Dec. 03, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 03, 2018
Summary: JUDGMENT ROBERT G. JAMES , District Judge . After an independent determination of the issues and review of the record, noting the lack of objections filed in the record, and a de novo determination of the issues, the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. 26] is correct and adopts the findings and conclusions therein as its own. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Smith's petition for writ of habeas corpus filed under 28 U.S.C. 2241 be DISMISSED WIT
Summary: JUDGMENT ROBERT G. JAMES , District Judge . After an independent determination of the issues and review of the record, noting the lack of objections filed in the record, and a de novo determination of the issues, the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. 26] is correct and adopts the findings and conclusions therein as its own. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Smith's petition for writ of habeas corpus filed under 28 U.S.C. 2241 be DISMISSED WITH..
More
JUDGMENT
ROBERT G. JAMES, District Judge.
After an independent determination of the issues and review of the record, noting the lack of objections filed in the record, and a de novo determination of the issues, the Court concludes that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. 26] is correct and adopts the findings and conclusions therein as its own.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Smith's petition for writ of habeas corpus filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
Source: Leagle