CURTIS v. CALDWELL, 11-14337. (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan
Number: infdco20120723630
Visitors: 17
Filed: Jul. 20, 2012
Latest Update: Jul. 20, 2012
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT DAVID M. LAWSON, District Judge. Presently before the Court is the report issued on June 26, 2012 by Magistrate Judge Paul J. Komives pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), recommending that this Court grant the defendant's motion for summary judgment. Although the magistrate judge's report explicitly stated that the parties to this action may object to and seek review of the recommendation within fourte
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT DAVID M. LAWSON, District Judge. Presently before the Court is the report issued on June 26, 2012 by Magistrate Judge Paul J. Komives pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), recommending that this Court grant the defendant's motion for summary judgment. Although the magistrate judge's report explicitly stated that the parties to this action may object to and seek review of the recommendation within fourtee..
More
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT
DAVID M. LAWSON, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is the report issued on June 26, 2012 by Magistrate Judge Paul J. Komives pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), recommending that this Court grant the defendant's motion for summary judgment. Although the magistrate judge's report explicitly stated that the parties to this action may object to and seek review of the recommendation within fourteen days of service of the report, no objections have been filed thus far. The parties' failure to file objections to the report and recommendation waives any further right to appeal. Smith v. Detroit Fed'n of Teachers Local 231, 829 F.2d 1370, 1373 (6th Cir. 1987). Likewise, the failure to object to the magistrate judge's report releases the Court from its duty to independently review the matter. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). However, the Court agrees with the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the magistrate judge's report and recommendation [dkt. #14] is ADOPTED.
It is further ORDERED that the defendant's motion for summary judgment [dkt. #9] is GRANTED.
It is further ORDERED that the plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
Source: Leagle
