O'Neill v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, 8:18-cv-385. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20191022a41
Visitors: 8
Filed: Oct. 21, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 21, 2019
Summary: PROGRESSION ORDER (AMENDED) CHERYL R. ZWART , Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER came before the Court on the Parties' Joint Motion for Enlargement of Time, Filing No. 24. The Court, being duly advised on the premises, finds that the Motion should be GRANTED. IT IS ORDERED that the progression order is amended as follows: 1) Any existing status conference, and settlement conference settings have been vacated. 2) The deadline for completing written discovery under Rules 33, 34, and 36 of the
Summary: PROGRESSION ORDER (AMENDED) CHERYL R. ZWART , Magistrate Judge . THIS MATTER came before the Court on the Parties' Joint Motion for Enlargement of Time, Filing No. 24. The Court, being duly advised on the premises, finds that the Motion should be GRANTED. IT IS ORDERED that the progression order is amended as follows: 1) Any existing status conference, and settlement conference settings have been vacated. 2) The deadline for completing written discovery under Rules 33, 34, and 36 of the F..
More
PROGRESSION ORDER (AMENDED)
CHERYL R. ZWART, Magistrate Judge.
THIS MATTER came before the Court on the Parties' Joint Motion for Enlargement of Time, Filing No. 24. The Court, being duly advised on the premises, finds that the Motion should be GRANTED.
IT IS ORDERED that the progression order is amended as follows:
1) Any existing status conference, and settlement conference settings have been vacated.
2) The deadline for completing written discovery under Rules 33, 34, and 36 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is January 20, 2020. Motions to compel discovery under Rules 33, 34, and 36 must be filed by February 3, 2020. Note: A motion to compel, to quash, or for a disputed protective order shall not be filed without first contacting the chambers of the undersigned magistrate judge to set a conference for discussing the parties' dispute.
3) The deadlines to complete expert disclosures for all experts expected to testify at trial, (both retained experts, (Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(B)), and non-retained experts, (Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(C)), are:
For the plaintiff(s): Complete.
For the defendant(s): December 6, 2019.
NOTE: While treating medical and mental health care providers are generally not considered "specially retained experts," their opinions arising from the care and treatment of the plaintiff must nonetheless be separately disclosed as required under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(C). Moreover, disclosure of mental or medical provider opinions not formed for the purpose of providing care and treatment of the illness or disease at issue in this litigation (e.g. whether medical billings were fair and reasonable, the proximate cause of the disease or injury, etc.) must disclosed as required under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(B).
4) The deposition deadline is January 20, 2020. The maximum number of depositions that may be taken by the plaintiffs as a group and the defendants as a group is 10.
5) The parties agree that in each case the maximum number of interrogatories, including subparts, that may be served by any party on any other party is 100.
6) The deadline for filing motions to dismiss and motions for summary judgment is March 9, 2020.
7) The deadline for filing motions to exclude testimony on Daubert and related grounds is March 9, 2020.
8) All requests for changes of deadlines or settings established herein shall be directed to the undersigned magistrate judge, including all requests for changes of trial dates. Such requests will not be considered absent a showing of due diligence in the timely progression of this case and the recent development of circumstances, unanticipated prior to the filing of the motion, which require that additional time be allowed. October 21, 2019.
Source: Leagle
