U.S. v. MANNON, 4:06CR3017. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Nebraska
Number: infdco20150504g76
Visitors: 7
Filed: May 01, 2015
Latest Update: May 01, 2015
Summary: ORDER CHERYL R. ZWART , Magistrate Judge . The defendant has moved for a review of the detention order. (Filing No. 87). Under 18 U.S.C. 3142(f) the magistrate judge may only review detention if "information exists that was not known to the movant at the time of the hearing and that has a material bearing" on the amelioration of the risks of nonappearance and safety. Therefore, motions for review of detention must specify the factual basis for the motion, the materiality of the facts to t
Summary: ORDER CHERYL R. ZWART , Magistrate Judge . The defendant has moved for a review of the detention order. (Filing No. 87). Under 18 U.S.C. 3142(f) the magistrate judge may only review detention if "information exists that was not known to the movant at the time of the hearing and that has a material bearing" on the amelioration of the risks of nonappearance and safety. Therefore, motions for review of detention must specify the factual basis for the motion, the materiality of the facts to th..
More
ORDER
CHERYL R. ZWART, Magistrate Judge.
The defendant has moved for a review of the detention order. (Filing No. 87). Under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f) the magistrate judge may only review detention if "information exists that was not known to the movant at the time of the hearing and that has a material bearing" on the amelioration of the risks of nonappearance and safety. Therefore, motions for review of detention must specify the factual basis for the motion, the materiality of the facts to the issues, and that the information was not known previously. The defendant's motion does not include this requisite information.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that the defendant's motion to review detention, (filing no. 87), is denied without prejudice to re-filing, if appropriate, in accordance with the requirements described in this order.
Source: Leagle
